Skip to content

Test archive / Lead form

Does matching the desktop lead form to mobile lift conversion?

Our desktop and mobile lead forms had drifted apart after an earlier mobile-only test. We tested a desktop form rebuilt to match mobile. Over 26 days, conversion fell 3.4%, short of our confidence bar.

Not significant Desktop 26 days Not called

SURFACE
Lead form
DEVICE
Desktop
VERTICAL
Lead Gen (CPL)
PRIMARY METRIC
Conversion rate
VARIATIONS
1

The hypothesis

By bringing the desktop form back in line with mobile, we will simplify the code and pick up gains from earlier mobile tests, resulting in more leads.

What we changed

The desktop lead form rebuilt to match the mobile version

An earlier focus test changed only the mobile form, so the 2 versions asked their questions differently. The variation matched desktop to mobile in 3 places: how visitors pick their debt situation, how many debt amount buttons they see, and how the contact questions are grouped into steps.

VAR A: NORMALIZE DESKTOP
  • Debt situation question matched to mobile
  • Debt amount buttons matched to mobile
  • Contact steps grouped as on mobile

The result

Conversion fell 3.4% on the matched desktop form, not a clear result

CONVERSION RATE
-3.4%
LEAD VALUE PER VISITOR
-14.8%

Over 26 days, the matched desktop form converted 3.4% worse than the original, and lead value per visitor was 14.8% lower. Neither gap reached our confidence bar. Desktop was a small share of traffic on this form, and the numbers barely moved for the whole test.

What we would do next

Use 1 shared form for both devices to simplify testing

Matching the forms did not change results in a way we could measure. Since 1 shared form is simpler to build and test on, we recommended implementing it and running future tests on both devices at once.

Let us find where your conversion opportunities are.

Request an evaluation