How travel websites earn more leads: what our A/B tests show
What we found
Travel visitors are planning, not buying. A softer first step lifted leads 14.6%, a focused landing page beat the homepage by 17.8%, and putting the form first did not help.
Most visitors to a travel website are planning, not buying. A long stay abroad is a big, expensive decision, and few people make it on their first visit. On the travel site we tested, the pages that earned more leads gave those planners a softer first step and the details they wanted before asking for theirs.
Travel visitors are planning, not buying
The site sells extended stays abroad to an older audience. Its goal is a lead: a visitor who asks for more information or joins the mailing list. Many visitors arrive early in planning. They want to see the places, the price and what is included before they talk to anyone.
That shapes every page. A page that asks for a commitment too early loses people who would have been glad to say yes a week later.
A focused landing page beat the homepage by 17.8%
Paid campaign traffic used to land on the homepage, with full navigation and many paths away from the lead form. We tested 2 focused landing pages in its place.
The version built around locations, star ratings and a single button won. Over 24 days, leads rose 17.8%. The version that led with the lead form did not match it. Removing competing calls to action, and holding the form back until visitors chose to act, gave the page 1 clear next step.
Evidence · Homepage · Won
Does a dedicated campaign landing page beat the homepage for leads?
24 days · responsive · We sent campaign traffic to 2 focused landing pages instead of the homepage.
+17.8% conversion
Read the full testIf you pay for travel traffic, send it to a page built for that visit. For more on landing pages, see How to convert website visitors into customers.
A softer first step lifted leads 14.6%
A landing page for solo travelers linked visitors straight into the booking app. That is a big step for someone still exploring. We updated the copy and pointed the links to location pages instead, where visitors could see what a stay in each place looks like and ask for more details.
Over 62 days, leads rose 14.6%. The variation led from the early weeks. Traffic to this page was low, so we let the test run longer to build confidence.
Evidence · Landing page · Won
Do location page links on a landing page earn more leads?
62 days · responsive · We updated the copy and pointed the page's links to destination pages.
+14.6% conversion
Read the full testPutting the form first on location pages did not help
On location pages, the destination details came first and the lead form sat below. We tested swapping them, so visitors ready to act could do it sooner. It started well, then reversed. Leads measured -3.6% over 13 days with no positive trend, so we paused the test.
Evidence · Location page · Not significant
Does moving the lead form up a location page earn more leads?
13 days · responsive · We swapped the lead form and the experience details on location pages.
-3.6% conversion
Read the full testVisitors preferred to read about the destination first. Later rounds kept the details first and tested ways to bring readers back to the form once they were ready.
Our usability tests said the same thing
We also ran 3 rounds of usability tests on this site. Testers knew who it was for within seconds, but kept asking what was included, what the fee covered, and what the cancellation and visa rules were. They wanted those answers before giving their details. The A/B tests above show what happens when a page respects that. We cover the full findings in Usability testing a travel website: what testers told us.
Low traffic? Test bigger changes and run longer
Travel sites often have pages with modest traffic. The solo traveler test needed 62 days to reach a confident result, and it paused twice when the testing tool hit its monthly traffic limit. On low-traffic pages, test changes big enough to move the number, like where a link leads, rather than small tweaks to wording or color. And plan for a longer run.
Retest peak-season winners when traffic returns to normal
Peak weeks bring a different audience. We give every test 2 weeks of data before calling it, watch results several times a day during peak, and never call a test on less than a full day of data. Then we retest the winner once the usual audience returns.
Where to start on a travel website
- Send paid traffic to a focused landing page with 1 next step.
- Give early planners a soft first step, such as a location page or an information request.
- Show the details before the form: places, price and what is included.
- Answer cost, cancellation and visa questions where visitors decide.
- Show reviews from real travelers, and say where they come from.
- On low-traffic pages, test bigger changes and plan for longer runs.
For the basics of testing, see What is CRO in marketing?
Travel visitors are planning, not buying. Give them a next step that fits.
Reviews had a bigger effect on higher-priced products: showing reviews raised conversion 380% for a higher-priced product, against 190% for a lower-priced one.
Medill Spiegel Research Center 2017, updated 2025 · spiegel.medill.northwestern.edu ↗
An extended stay abroad is a high-priced decision, and our usability testers asked to hear from past guests before they would commit.
Frequently asked questions
How do you increase leads on a travel website?
Give visitors who are still planning a softer first step and the details they want before the form. In our tests, linking to location pages before the booking app lifted leads 14.6%.
Should a travel landing page lead with the form?
Not in our tests. A landing page built around locations and a single button beat a lead-first version, and moving the form above destination details on location pages did not help.
What do travel visitors need before they inquire?
Places, price, what is included, cancellation and visa rules, and reviews from real travelers. Our usability testers asked for all of these before giving their details.
How long should an A/B test run on a low-traffic travel page?
Longer than usual. 1 of our travel tests needed 62 days to reach a confident result. Test bigger changes so the effect shows up sooner.
Do travel A/B test results change by season?
They can. Results from peak booking weeks can come from a different audience, so we retest a peak-season winner once traffic returns to normal.
The evidence
The 3 tests this article leans on
Evidence · Homepage · Won
Does a dedicated campaign landing page beat the homepage for leads?
+17.8% conversion
Read the full testEvidence · Landing page · Won
+14.6% conversion
Read the full testEvidence · Location page · Not significant
Does moving the lead form up a location page earn more leads?
-3.6% conversion
Read the full test