Skip to content

Test archive / Article page

Does a native-styled partner unit get more clicks on articles?

Our article pages showed a partner offer unit that looked like an outside ad. We restyled it to match the site's own design. Over 19 days, clicks on the partner unit rose 47.1%.

Won Responsive 19 days Called at 90%

SURFACE
Article page
DEVICE
Responsive
VERTICAL
Ecommerce (B2C)
PRIMARY METRIC
Conversion rate
VARIATIONS
1

The hypothesis

By making the partner unit look native to the site, we will give readers more confidence that it comes from a trusted partner, resulting in more clicks.

Readers on article pages are used to skipping anything that looks like an ad. If the partner unit matched the site's own design, it would read as part of the page and earn more trust.

What we changed

The partner unit restyled to match the site's own design

Var A kept the same offer and position but restyled the partner unit to match the site's design, so it read as part of the article instead of a third-party ad.

VAR A: NATIVE DESIGN
  • Partner unit restyled to match the site
  • Same offer and position

The result

Clicks on the partner unit rose 47.1% with the native design

CONVERSION RATE
+47.1%

Over 19 days, the native design drew 47.1% more clicks on the partner unit than the original, on mobile and desktop combined. The lift cleared our confidence bar, and we implemented the new design. This test tracked clicks only.

What we took from it

Readers trusted the unit more when it looked like the site

The original unit looked like an outside ad, which made it easy to skip. Matching the site's design made the offer feel like part of the article, and more readers clicked. Later tests on this page built on the new design.

Let us find where your conversion opportunities are.

Request an evaluation